Underemployment rate hard to calculate

Lack of information on number of underemployed masks problem

Define underemployment as the under-utilization of labor resources. A high rate of underemployment is one expression of overcapacity in the labor market (the other being, of course, unemployment).

The overall unemployment rate in the U.S as of the time of this writing is 9.4 percent. That statistic is grotesquely deflated by the number of discouraged workers and the number of underemployed workers.

Underemployment is like that guy who owes you money -- seemingly impossible to track down. The government provides a measurement called the underemployment reading, as of March (2009) reported as being over 14 percent. (It would be safe to assume it has since deteriorated.) The problem with the underemployment reading is that it only measures part-time workers who would like to work full-time. It does not account for people working jobs that are "beneath them." I'm all for the work ethic and very much in agreement with the idea that there is honor in all honest labor, but someone with an MS in Computer Science should not be tending bar, even full-time. Such situations under-utilize labor resources -- the definition of underemployment -- but it is well-nigh impossible to measure how many geniuses are driving hotel vans.

Conclusion: Nobody knows what the real underemployment rate is. We know that the official unemployment rate is 9.4 percent. We know that the "underemployment reading" is over 14 percent. That adds up to 25 percent of workers unemployed or underemployed. That doesn't even count discouraged workers, neither looking for work nor working. Tack on another very conservative 5 percent there. That leaves us with around 30 percent of workers unemployed or underemployed in the U.S. The only thing we can say definitively is that it amounts to a whole lot of people.

Share/Save

Comments

chuck's picture

Come on, I know you're reading.

Say something, please.

Underemployment

The underemployment problem seems like a Catch-22. Employers hire part-time until the economy gets better -- but how will it get better when so many people are living on part-time wages? The hard-working and enterprising among us can make up the difference with two part-time jobs, freelancing/consulting work, or a home-based business.

chuck's picture

Yup

Even part-time jobs are hard to get these day, though, with all the competition. I think this recession/depression is going to fundamentally re-form our economy. Ten years from now, a lot more people will be happily self-employed, doing business in their own communities on a smaller scale. It will be good because the middleman -- the employer -- will be cut out.

Thanks for playing.

But is the small business engine broken now?

Ten years from now, a lot more people will be happily self-employed, doing business in their own communities on a smaller scale.

I hope you're right, but now I'm not so sure ...

http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/2009-06-30-small-businesses-...

I do agree that the workplace is being fundamentally changed on a grand scale. The question is, how painful (and long) is this transition going to be?

Personal soapbox: I think the CEOs, with their ever-increasing pay ratios and their outsourcing/offshoring and other ruthless behavior, are reaping what they've sown. Unfortunately, so are the rest of us. The US Government has got to wake up to the fact that all these influence-buying mega-multinationals are going to run all of us into the ground and instead start giving adequate support to small businesses.

chuck's picture

Right there with ya', sista'

The US Government has got to wake up to the fact that all these influence-buying mega-multinationals are going to run all of us into the ground and instead start giving adequate support to small businesses.

Everybody I talk to agrees about this. Did you know that they're using the stimulus money to cover 75 percent of COBRA payments? I just learned that yesterday right here on this blog thanks to an astute commenter. That would be great, except that the payments are so ridiculously overpriced. The government is just giving billions of dollars away to the insurance companies, who give millions back to their congresspets. It's incredibly corrupt and rotten to the core at this point.

People are going to have to stand together and help each other out. I think the next ten years will be some of the roughest in American history, but I'm also convinced that we can come out the other side much better off. We need a social catharsis.

That link to the USA Today story is depressing as all get out.

Yes, it's Debbie Downer again

That link to the USA Today story is depressing as all get out.

Yeah ... I've already bummed out three people (including you) in the last 24 hours with that one. I'm that powerful a force for positive change. ;-)

Seriously, I still believe in capitalism (not as a good in and of itself, but as a force for good in the right hands), but the whole influence-buying, labor-market-manipulating, competition-stifling shtick has got to go.

underemployment rates

You know, if the underemployed group owed the government money, they'd be able to find us all fairly easily. Probably at a cost exceeding what we owe.

chuck's picture

They can find you, alright.

They just can't tell that you're underemployed.

One good thing about being underemployed or unemployed is that you're not in much danger of owing the government money.